March, 2002
Rho Tau Girls Strutting on the Runway
Leather, chiffon, sequins, and silk.
What do these items have in common? The annual Rho Tau Fashion Show, of course!
At the February meeting the Rho Tau girls strutted their stuff from eye popping leather clubbing outfits to elegant sequinned evening gowns. The membership was treated to a dazzling array of fashions ranging from casual attire to evening wear.
The girls did an amazing of job of quickly changing their outfits as the different categories were presented. Rumor has it that Tiffany Michelle runs a tight ship in the changing room!
The fashion show winners were:
Clubbing - Anna
Evening Wear - Bobbi Jean
Casual Attire - Robyn
Business - Jessica
Valentine - Pam
![]() Bobbi Jean in her dazzling evening gown! |
![]() Pam in her winning Valentine's outfit... everone wanted her shoes! |
![]() Jessica is definitely businesslike. |
![]() And Robyn is just decidedly casual! |
![]() Anna is ready to go clubbing! |
|
Return to top
|
Alvin and the Chipmunks
I think everyone has heard that in Elizabethan theatre, all parts (including the female ones) where played by males. It was during this time that the term "DRAG" was actually coined. The "casting call" for plays had this word next to the female roles and stood for "Dress Required As Girl". Anyway, there is an Asian equivalent to this type of theatre called "Kabuki"... in which select male actors are specifically trained for female roles. If I am not mistaken, I think the Kabuki Theatre still has the same practices.
"Maids In Japan" - This
episode takes a lighthearted look at the Kabuki Theatre when the Chipmunks fulfill a
singing contract on a special trip to Japan! Little did they know, it would be as Geisha
girls! Even David Seville gets roped into performing! Hey Dave... look good there... maybe
a little "too" good!
Return to top
Don't panic! Take a breath; everything is OK. Really! I know that "Guys in
Groups" is a very scary headline! At least in me it triggers the classic
fight-or-flight response. And I want to flee.
I'll never fully comprehend how and why I came to be blessed with a blurred gender
identity in which cross-dressing is an element of life as vital to me as air, food, water,
and shelter. Several years ago I spent the better part of two years working with a very
good gender therapist (Dr. Gerald Ramsey of Ghent Psychological Services in Norfolk)
developing an understanding of myself that works for me and put me at peace with a
conflict that had tormented me for decades. (My understanding doesn't really help my wife
understand. But in another way she is very understanding; otherwise it is highly unlikely
that I would be able to participate in Rho Tau at all-but I digress.)
I know that in part my comfort with my cross-dressing is a correlative to my
significant discomfort when in groups of males. This, I believe, has its roots in
childhood experiences. I was the prototypical spindly-armed, skinny, weak, un-athletic
kid, fearful of getting hit by a pitched ball, of being tackled by a big bruiser, even of
being picked on for being these things. Of course I got picked on, but I was rarely picked
when it was time to choose teams! I didn't handle any of this well. What kid does? But I
think my responses were more immature than the usual, replying with name-calling and often
fleeing in tears. In other words, the other boys soon learned that I was easily goaded,
that I posed no physical threat to them, and that I could be good entertainment when they
brought me to tears and I sulked off, their shouted taunts and insults ("sissy!"
and "cry baby!") following me. I think they learned one other thing, something
that I consider to be one of the very worst characteristics of American culture-they
learned how to feel superior; and, as hurt as I felt on those occasions, to feel good
about themselves because of that superiority.
They were living up to what Dr. William Pollack, a Harvard psychologist and author of Real
Boys (New York: Henry Holt, 1998)-a book I recommend that all T-girls read-calls "the
boy code." The boy code consists-from my point of view, at least-mostly of negative
precepts. It is a litany of "Don'ts" including things such as:
· Don't show emotion
· Don't touch another male, unless in aggression or in celebration of his successful display of physical prowess (e.g., after scoring a touchdown)
· Don't let another male touch you, unless congratulating your for successful display of physical prowess
· Don't cry
· Don't do anything that is "sissy"
· Don't show any sign of weakness
The only precept of the boy code that I can think of that is stated in positive terms
is "Be strong." "Be strong" is itself a code statement for the
summation of the boy code's many negative precepts.
Alas for American society-the boy code mutates into American masculinity and the
glorification of John Wayne, Arnold Schwarzeneger (a foreign-born icon of American
masculinity), and fictional hero Rocky Balboa. The films featuring these actors and
characters demonstrate the underlying principle of American masculinity: it can never be
attained for keeps; it needs to be renewed again and again and again. This incessant quest
for masculinity allows little room for the development of those traits that are not
explicitly part of the very narrow boy code and adult masculinity code.
The only way a man who wants to live up to the image of American masculinity can feel
comfortable with himself is to assert his masculinity again and again. And the only way to
assert American masculinity is to exalt oneself by putting another male down. This can
take the form of verbal put-downs ranging from good-natured kidding to biting sarcasm,
physical attack ranging from playful-but-firm to harmful, or at its worst a bullet fired
from a gun. In an environment such as guys in groups where many, perhaps even all, present
are trying to assert their masculinity, each individual must choose fight or flight.
Unless the stakes are very high and physical safety or life itself are at risk, most guys
who see themselves as guys will take part in the competition.
This is not to say that competition is the exclusive province of males. My wife assures me
that all is not a bower of bliss in groups of women. Competition among the ladies takes
subtler forms, she tells me-from who is wearing the most fashionable and expensive clothes
or jewelry to who has lost the most weight to whose kids are the biggest successes in
school, soccer, etc. And she assures me that much of it is expressed silently, obliquely,
or cattily, but never with the unmistakable directness of a "manly" bar brawl
punch in the face.
Since I haven't had her experience, I can't relate empathetically to my wife's
explanation of the downside of women in groups. I think that among those emotional
experiences society assumes are the exclusive province of women, there are only two I can
ever empathize with completely. Those are "I have nothing to wear for that!"
and, when in public dressed en femme, a sense of vulnerability for my physical safety.
Nevertheless I continue to envy (deeply) the easy familiarity women display in greeting
each other, their touching, the ease with which they form ad hoc groups at social
gatherings, and their willingness to share their feelings with one another!
As cross-dressers we may not achieve these same positive feminine attributes, at least not
as completely as women do. However when I am in a group of my sisters I feel at ease,
comfortable, welcomed, accepted, even loved in a way I have never experienced and probably
never will experience among a group of guys. I shouldn't have to dress en femme to feel
that way in any group; but I do and I treasure the gift of my transgenderedness and the
opportunities it gives me to enjoy the company of some very special "guys" in a
group-guys in skirts! Thank you, girls!!!
-Jamie Roberts
Return to top